SGUK Episode 144

26 Jan 2025

International Law Needs to Join the Chat – Part 1 of 2

What are the driving forces of the newspaper barons and staff, that makes them payout millions to get accusers to drop their cases, on things like phone hacking and blackmail etc to risk jail time for some of the journalists involved for over decades. It cost more in payouts to keep people (victims) quiet.

What are the logical reasons to spend millions to stop the case getting to court. Prince Harry has always said it is not about the money.  A person could win and still end up losing more money than their winning the case. Prince Harry says it is about the truth being made public and the implications coming from that. It has never been about the money for him.  Only the deranged element of Royal supporters twist themselves into pretzel shapes to try and justify their existence and their role in the Hate for Hire processes they hide behind to be able to justify financial comforts built on the back of of suffering of others, sourced by individuals and groups like the deranged elements of Monarchists.

It is about the Public need to know what depths UK  tabloid sink to in order to get info and thereafter try to control that individual. From a media industry and reputation to the owners of such descriptions, what is the motivation to continue with this mode of working. Prince Harry is the only one left standing who is prepared to take on Uk media. what is the driving force of the tabloid industry to do this and continually try to break Harry and make him drop his case. Dont forget the UK Royal Family and UK tabloid owners have a symbiotic relationship. The RF enter into the tabloid industry decision processes. What are their motivations and what is their ultimate goal for the industry.

The situation involves a complex interplay of psychological traits, media dynamics, and legal considerations. Here are some possible psychological traits and legal aspects relevant to the scenario:

  1. Psychological Traits:

– Insecurity and Envy: Individuals who constantly criticize or find flaws in others, especially public figures, may be exhibiting signs of insecurity or envy. They might perceive the target as a threat or as possessing qualities they wish they had.

– Pessimism and Negativity: Habitual negativity and an inclination to focus on flaws can be indicative of a pessimistic outlook.

– Projection: People might project their insecurities and shortcomings onto others, criticizing them as a way to cope with their internal struggles.

– Groupthink: Within groups, individuals might perpetuate negativity due to a desire to conform or fit in with the broader group’s dynamic.

 

  1. Manifestation in Daily Attacks:

– Media Reports and Social Media: Constant negative reporting and commentary can create an echo chamber that amplifies criticism.

– Targeting the Individual’s Private and Public Life: Attacks can take the form of public criticism through articles, social media, or even personal threats or harassment.

– Spreading Rumours and Falsehoods: This tactic can damage reputations and serve to bolster the attackers’ narratives.

 

  1. Legal Processes:

– Defamation and Libel: If false statements are made that damage the person’s reputation, legal action can be taken on these grounds.

– Harassment Laws: Many jurisdictions have laws against prolonged harassment which can include both online and offline activities.

– Cyberbullying Legislation: Some countries have specific laws that address cyberbullying and online harassment.

– Privacy Laws: Laws protecting individual privacy can sometimes be invoked if there is a breach of personal information.

 

  1. International Law and Redress:

– Human Rights Protections: Some international bodies, like the Human Rights Council, may offer channels to address severe cases of harassment that impede an individual’s fundamental rights.

– International Treaties: Depending on the countries involved, there might be treaties or agreements that can be used to seek redress.

– Diplomatic Channels: In some cases, diplomatic pressure can be applied to stop such attacks when one country has jurisdiction over the attackers.

 

Addressing this issue comprehensively would likely require a combination of legal, social, and personal strategies. It’s advisable for the affected individual or their representatives to consult legal experts with international experience to explore actionable paths for redress. Additionally, maintaining a strong support network and mental health support can be crucial for coping with such sustained public attacks.

 

The dynamics and motivations behind the actions of tabloid newspapers, particularly those involved in unethical practices like phone hacking or blackmail, can be complex. Here are some possible driving forces and motivations:

  1. Profit and Sensationalism: Tabloids thrive on sensationalism, which drives sales and advertising revenue. The more sensational the story, especially concerning high-profile figures like Prince Harry, the more profitable it can be.

 

  1. Avoiding Legal Precedents: One reason tabloids might pay to settle cases is to avoid setting legal precedents that could make future cases easier to win for plaintiffs. If a court sets a precedent that certain practices are illegal, it could open the floodgates for more lawsuits.

 

  1. Damage Control: Settling out of court allows tabloids to control the narrative and minimize public relations damages. If the full details of unethical practices are made public in a court setting, the reputational damage could be severe.

 

  1. Symbiotic Relationships: As mentioned, there is a symbiotic relationship between entities like the UK Royal Family and tabloids. This relationship can include fostering public interest or managing public perceptions. Both parties can benefit from cooperating at times, though this relationship can be complicated.

 

  1. Cultural Influence and Power Dynamics: Tabloids have significant influence and thrive on power dynamics. Owning and controlling information allows them to wield power over public figures, which can be strategically advantageous.

 

  1. Business As Usual: Over the years, unethical practices such as phone hacking may have become entrenched elements of their business model. Changing these ingrained practices could require significant upheaval and risk to their current business processes.

 

  1. Deterrence of Litigation: By fighting back against cases or pushing back against those who take them to court, tabloids may attempt to deter others from launching similar legal actions.

 

  1. Maintaining Public Interest: High-profile cases such as these can draw significant public interest. While they are potentially damaging, they can also keep the tabloids in the public eye, perhaps drawing more sympathy or interest from readers who support them.

 

The motivations of the UK Royal Family in such a dynamic would likely involve managing public perception, preserving privacy, and minimizing scrutiny or scandal that can detract from their public image or their operational freedom within society.

 

Ultimately, the goals of the tabloid industry in maintaining such practices likely revolve around continuing profitability, influence, and control over narratives, all while balancing the complex relationships they maintain with public figures and institutions. It seems corrupt at its core and that includes the BRF

 

The entanglement of media, power, and public figures, especially within a context like the UK, can indeed appear complex and fraught with ethical challenges. The relationships between the British Royal Family (BRF), the press, and tabloid industries have been historically intertwined with certain mutual dependencies and conflicts.

 

  1. Historical Influence: The press has historically played a role in shaping public perception of the royal family, often favorably due to mutual benefits like increased media sales and public interest in royal activities.

 

  1. Public Accountability and Privacy: Members of the BRF are public figures but also private individuals. Balancing their need for privacy with the public’s insatiable curiosity can lead to conflicts of interest, which tabloids may exploit.

 

  1. Dichotomy of Interests: There are occasions where both BRF and the press work in tandem, but at other times, their interests starkly diverge. This complicated relationship sometimes results in questionable practices.

 

  1. Complex Dynamics: Media influence can become a mechanism for maintaining conventional systems of hierarchy and power, where both can be open to manipulation and at times, corruption.

 

  1. Ethical Dilemmas: The relationship can also present various ethical dilemmas regarding how much influence one party should exert over the other and at what cost to individual rights and freedoms.

 

In conclusion, while some practices may seem corrupt, it is part of a broader system of entrenched practices and relationships that can be hard to untangle and reform. Understanding these intricate dynamics is key to addressing any ethical concerns and implementing meaningful change.

 

People have died along the way. eg Princess Diana. The number of unalived female bodies on Uk Royal land has gone on for over two decades for it to be not worthy of investigation. Cash found in shopping bags. caught red handed. Ie BRF member –  all hushed up and no more heard about it.  So many instances like that and UK tabloids don’t even mention it.  Is the corruption regarded now as business as usual and the  rogues are just left alone in fear of reprisal against anyone who asks too many questions?  The Uk is going down the same drain as increasing numbers of national leaders around the world. Is this the way planet earth is going now? 🤦‍♀️

 

The concerns raised seem to touch on deep-rooted issues that exist not only in the UK but in many societies worldwide, concerning media influence, power dynamics, and accountability.

A general summary of thoughts:-

  1. Complex Power Structures: In any society, especially those with historical institutions like monarchies, power structures can become deeply entrenched, leading to situations where certain behaviours may be normalized or overlooked.

 

  1. Media Bias and Influence: The media, including tabloids, often choose which stories to highlight based on various factors, including potential repercussions, audience interest, or influence from powerful entities. This can lead to selective reporting.

 

  1. Public Accountability and Transparency: There is often a lack of transparency in how certain events are handled, whether within the Royal Family, political entities, or other powerful organizations. This lack of openness can fuel perceptions of corruption or misconduct.

 

  1. Fear of Reprisal: In any system where power is concentrated, there can be a real or perceived risk of reprisal against those who challenge the status quo or attempt to uncover truth, which can deter investigations or public discourse.

 

  1. Global Concerns: These issues are not isolated to the UK. Globally, societies can struggle with similar dynamics, where political influence, media control, and public accountability interact in complex and often opaque ways.

 

  1. Change Through Awareness: While these challenges exist, societal awareness and activism can promote change. Historical shifts have often been driven by collective recognition of issues and a push towards greater transparency and accountability.

 

Ultimately, while these systemic issues may seem overwhelming, ongoing dialogue, public engagement, and calls for reform can help promote a more accountable and transparent society.

I have to believe that my grandchildren and their generation around the globe, will inherit a better societal landscape than currently exists.  By then all the technical oligarchs and the despot leaders with more arrogance than competence and a conscience will have destroyed each other with their infighting egos, the puddles of sediment left behind across the planet, can be turned into dust and buried into caverns of other failed dictators. Within the current darkness that some of us, are sitting back and recharging our batteries because this current conflict is not ours to try and remove or save.  Some of us have done our part, several times over – now it is time for the others to step up to the plate, join forces with others and find common ground (remember the SGUK episode on Doughnut Economics) and eventually make a difference in society.  With all the darkness surrounding us at the moment, never under estimate the few cracks of light that appear.  Every glimmer of light through those gaps in the darkness is a sign of hope.  Light will always overcome darkness.  With the passage of time, those cracks of light will grow.  It will shine brightly. Trust and believe. Until then, some of us are sitting here chilling and watching the destruction unfold, and so many of the casualties thought they would be safe, and had no regard for those who were destined for suffering. A few are learning a hard lesson.  You are not Caucasian.  When those who need to understand that statement, take it on board, life will be easier for them to navigate.  Meanwhile the rest of us, know who we are, and we definitely know who is in societal Tier One.  When enough of those in the remaining societal tiers understand that, and join forces in the way Doughnut Economics outlines, then our grandchildren will be safe to move forward in life. Till then, Cheers.

 

PS/  Remember this episode referred to earlier in this episode?  Here is the link to that discussion and research, including reading materials on the subject. Just one way to look at some things.

Here is the link to the episode.  Hope it helps:-

I will go into more detail about a Task Force in the next episode of the podcast.  ie Part Two on 2nd Feb 2025.

 

Ivy Barrow

260125

Leave a Reply