SGUK Episode 132



Once again the UK Royal Family and its televised and printed media are devoting 87% (my opinion) of their time thinking of ways to control two people who left their roles as Senior Working Royals, and moved to another continent, to start earning income for themselves. The couple are not tax payer funded.  The target of their incensed behaviour is the female of the duo (as is always the way in the misogynistic management style of the UK Monarchy) and this has been going on since the moment that the family and its friends in the media were informed that Meghan Markle a USA citizen,  an actress and philanthropist was in a relationship with Prince Harry, the youngest son of Princess Diana and the current King Charles III.  This information was placed into the main domain in June 2016 and for the first two years, the racist undertones were building but at the same time, the thought was that this relationship would not last.  One Royal Expert (member of a group known as the carnival of clowns) was bold enough to say out loud, and with full conviction, that no member of the BRF would marry an actress. And that this relationship was Harry enjoying a “fling” and not someone he would marry. Following the marriage in 2018, the last 6 years have been embarrassing to see.  The ramping up of the racist rhetoric and the activity that clearly breached key areas of the law, has been left to run riot, as the establishment is so far openly Right Wing, I no longer now recognise the country of my birth.  I am thankful that I have less years on the planet than I have lived. As a person of colour, I no longer feel that arguing or discourse with people who are in the corridors of power due to wealth not competency, or the lottery of the birth canal belonging to certain people. Until the population of the UK wake up and realise that a whole list of groups will be targeted, one by one, and ethnicity is just the start.  One day most of the population will be corralled into one or more of these targeted groups.  Don’t wait to be corralled like livestock, wake up now, and recognise the implications of what is on the horizon.


The Symptoms of Psychosis

Psychosis is when people lose some contact with reality. This might involve seeing or hearing things that other people cannot see or hear (hallucinations) and believing things that are not actually true (delusions). It may also involve confused (disordered) thinking and speaking.

The 3 main symptoms of psychosis are:

  • hallucinations – where a person hears, sees and, in some cases, feels, smells or tastes things that do not exist outside their mind but can feel very real to the person affected by them; a common hallucination is hearing voices
  • delusions – where a person has strong beliefs that are not shared by others; a common delusion is someone believing there’s a conspiracy to harm them
  • disordered thinking and speaking – a person’s thoughts and ideas come very quickly, which can make their speech fast and confusing

The combination of hallucinations and delusional thinking can cause severe distress and a change in behaviour.

Causes of psychosis

It’s sometimes possible to identify the cause of psychosis as a specific mental health condition, such as:

  • schizophrenia – a condition that causes a range of psychological symptoms, including hallucinations and delusions
  • bipolar disorder – a mental health condition that affects mood; a person with bipolar disorder can have episodes of low mood (depression) and highs or elated mood (mania)
  • severe depression – some people with depression also have symptoms of psychosis when they’re very depressed

Psychosis can also be triggered by:

How often a psychotic episode occurs and how long it lasts can depend on the underlying cause.

Symptoms – Psychosis

Someone who develops psychosis will have their own unique set of symptoms and experiences, according to their particular circumstances.

But in general, 3 main symptoms mentioned earlier are associated with a psychotic episode:

  • hallucinations
  • delusions
  • confused and disturbed thoughts


A person with grandiose delusions may believe they have power or authority. For example, they may think they’re the president of a country or they have the power to bring people back from the dead.

People who have psychotic episodes are often unaware that their delusions or hallucinations are not real, which may lead them to feel frightened or distressed.

Confused and disturbed thoughts

People with psychosis sometimes have disturbed, confused, and disrupted patterns of thought.

 14 Years Spent Dismantling the UK and The Figurehead Family is Responsible for 8 years of its Demolition in Full Progress.

Extracts from articles and social media posts 2017 – 2023

“I see “Operation Media Revenge” over lack of access to Meghan’s womb is in full force”

“ British media have become bullies and abusers.  Seriously, what they seem to forget, they bullied Meghan throughout her entire pregnancy.  Harry and Meghan have all the rights to not expose their child to that kind of abuse”

“I am a British tax payer.  You and your paper do not speak for me.  I fully support the choices of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in how they are managing the media.  The sense of entitlement of the British media is nauseating and an embarrassment.  Please stop embarrassing the UK.”

“article in one of the national newspapers in the UK, written by one of the group of RRs, “where the article not only showed in great detail the inside of the home of the DDoS but also showed the actual postal address, weeks after a New Nazi plot to kill the Duke for “race treason” was uncovered.  These RRs have no integrity.”

British media have become bullies and abusers, and seriously, what they seem to forget, they bullied Meghan throughout her entire pregnancy.  Harry and Meghan have all the rights to not expose their children to that kind of abuse.”

I am far from being a Royalist but the way media hacks like Sarah Vine and that Dan Wootton are going after Meghan is quite something to witness.  These people are the same  that would slag Diana off and then cry croc tears when she died.  What is it about Meghan that they hate?”


British Decline Linked to Brexit

Extract from this article in The Independent dated 16th May 2024 by David Maddox – Political Editor.

Weak leadership, poor economic management and Brexit have dragged Britain out of the top 10 countries in a global index on good government.

The decline of Britain under the Tories has been charted by the global Chandler Good Government Index (CGGI) which saw it take 11th place.

At a time when Rishi Sunak has been under siege from his own Tory MPs, the UK’s place on the annual list was made worse by scores for “leadership and foresight” putting it in 20th place.

It was also hit by coming 27th in “financial stewardship”. The findings come amid a report of an exodus by companies from the City of London.

Despite Brexit and the fallout of leaving the EU, Britain’s position was boosted by coming second in the “reputation and global influence” category, being only beaten by France. Overall Singapore came top of the index. However, Brexit hurt the UK badly in its international trade score, with it dropping by 26 places.

The report noted that leadership makes an important difference.

It stated: “What public sector leaders decide, do, or say impacts public trust in government. Good leaders create and sustain cultures of integrity, competence, and service. They have a clear sense of medium- and longer-term pathways for their government and country. They cultivate the foresight needed to anticipate emerging challenges and opportunities.”

It scored countries’ governments for ethical leadership, long-term vision, adaptability, strategic prioritisation and innovation.

Meanwhile, financial stewardship was scored on government debt levels, spending efficiency, budget surplus, and risk premium.

The UK’s global influence score was high but was harmed by being outside the EU, meaning that its status on international trade had dropped from joint second to 28th.

The findings were the conclusion of CGGI’s panel of experts and leaders in the world of business and government.

They included Dr Reuben Abraham, chief executive of Artha Global; Elizabeth Andersen, executive director of the World Justice Project; Dr Christian Bason, founder of the Transition Collective; Nathalie Delapalme, chief executive of the Mo Ibrahim Foundation; Adrian Brown, executive director of the Centre for Public Impact; Dr Ed Olowo-Okere, vice president at the World Bank; Dr Manuel Gerardo Flores Romero from the OECD; and Professor Kent Weaver, professor of public policy and government at Georgetown University.

Labour has jumped on the findings as evidence that the political chaos under the Tories and uncertainty surrounding Rishi Sunak’s leadership coupled with the fallout of Liz Truss’s mini-budget have put the UK into decline.

Shadow chief Treasury secretary Darren Jones said: “These new rankings fly in the face of Rishi Sunak’s argument that we are turning the corner.

“The United Kingdom is a brilliant place with so much potential, but we have been disastrously let down by 14 years of chaos, with five prime ministers in seven years and our economy still reeling from the Tories’ bombshell mini-budget.

“Labour has a real plan to turn the page on this decline. With Keir Starmer’s Labour Party, we will spur on a decade of renewal with strong fiscal rules, a new national wealth fund to make smart, strategic investments in the industries of the future, and public services we can be proud of again.”

The findings come as Sir Keir Starmer in effect launched Labour’s election campaign with a top promise of “economic stability” in his six first steps published on a new pledge card.

But Downing Street sources said they found the findings “strange” and “lacking in evidence”.

A source close to the prime minister said: “I would point you to GDP stats and what they showed last week. Joint fastest growth in the G7, one of best and fastest recoveries since pandemic (Germany and others still in recession) so not sure how the facts tally with their rankings.”

My thoughts on the government response, is this, keep on spouting such nonsense, in the belief that because it is coming from yourselves, it must be true.  If you were new to being in power, you might have had some chance, but after 14 years of pillaging and creative accounting over that whole period, the only people who are worse off overall, during the course of you being in power, and the working class population, and within that, you are now targeting vulnerable groups.  You spent 14 years vilifying people coming here to the Uk to work, work in jobs that the UK did not want to undertake for a variety of reasons, including low pay.  Brexit happened and look where we are now.

Particular attention was paid to people of colour who came here to work – some of them working here for many years, in  professions that took years to reach a high standard.  You penalised their ability to have their families with them, and in a similar way you targeted international students.  University fees have become so high, and the staffing levels reduced because universities cannot afford to employ the same amount of staff as in previous years, university establishments have relied on a certain percentage of the student intake  to be international students.  This government has made it so expensive for foreign students to come here and study, and their fees were multiples higher than what the UK students had to find.  As a direct result, international students are joining universities anywhere but the UK, which is of course a huge reduction in the anticipated income by universities already struggling.

I can remember after a similar purge on nursing staff in the NHS, and the difficulties placed upon foreign trained nurses coming to the UK, once again, the UK made it hard for professionals to come here and work. Within two years of that information becoming a concern in other countries, the UK had an 80% reduction in applications.  Whatever the figure is now, I am sure that it is not anywhere near what it used to be.  Those nurses were snapped up by other nations, and naturally Doctors were readily accepted in the USA and Canada as just two examples.

So, to quote that the UK was “joint fastest growth in the G7”  Really?  With whom, and what was the base level as a starting point? The majority of the UK population have not felt an improvement, and by the time you work your way through your list of targeted areas of the population, including the elderly (we have not forgotten the approach and sentiments publicly expressed and printed about how elderly people will die soon anyway, so just pile them high, or words to that effect.  That is not an indication of a nation doing well.

Worth adding that when you add the fact that the majority of affluent individuals who have so much of an input into decisions made by this government, helped by publicly declared donations to the same government, do not actually reside here in the UK.  There must be a reason for that, ie those who can afford to live outside of the UK, still have huge power and input as to what happens and does not happen in the world of business within the UK.

  • To top it all off we have the figurehead family at the top of the societal tree. I looked up earlier this month, what were the priorities of King Charles in the next two years.  I then looked up the priorities in the Kings Speech in Nov 2023, which are the priorities of the Monarch’s government.  One would think they were similar, but you would be wrong.  The statement published for the occasion and read out by the King was as follows – ie a summary:- “My government will in all respects seek to make long-term decisions in the interests of future generations. My ministers will address inflation and the drivers of low growth over demands for greater spending or borrowing. My ministers will put the security of communities and the nation ahead of the rights of those who endanger it.”
  • The four main headings were :
    • Growing the Economy
    • Strengthening Society
    • Keeping People Safe
    • Promoting our national interests


When I looked at the Kings priorities they all related to Climate Change. In effect, officially the Monarch reads the wishes of his/her government.  Officially the King or Queen has no political power, but exists as a form of balance between the people and the government.  Notice how the Kings priorities do not echo anything in the Government list of priorities, King Charles is there merely to read it out.  All that performative activity, including the crown having its own car to travel to a building for the King to read out a list of priorities and actions which do not and will never apply to him or the Monarchy family.

Similarly the Kings priorities all centre on climate change and what he would like to see take place within the country.  Let us not forget that none of the legislation around climate change and related topics apply to the Royal family.  They have no standards to meet, or measurements recorded.  No targets.  Unlike all other businesses in the UK who have no such exemptions, the King is going to state priorities and recommend others do things that he and his family do not have to adhere to.  This is why I don’t watch or listen to the King or Queen’s speech, because it is all performative by every member of government and its Monarchy family.  Anyone can read out the governments wishes. Calling it the Kings speech does not require him to read it out, especially as he did not put it together anyway. It is all for performance and optics, and with each passing year, it looks more and more a costly waste of time, in my opinion.  The hourly rate for all involved must be astronomical and as the public pay for the Royal elements, who by the way looked totally bored of the whole set up, and wanted to be anywhere but there on last years event, it was a waste of our hard earned money.  No one need come at me for saying that, because footage exists in abundance, and it was obvious to even those with less than stellar eyesight.

We will return at the end of the diverse nature of government and its Monarchy, and where the two groups converge and agree and why.

 The Psychosis is Real.

Headlines Stating that Harry and Meghan or Meghan only is not welcome in the UK

A few examples of headlines from a few newspapers or social media platforms by whilst still claiming that the Uk is not a racist nation, and Meghan was welcomed here.  I could do a year of podcasts, and it would only touch the surface of the real life experiences here within the UK, and most of the elite top societal groups will never see it or experience any of it, so in their minds it does not exist.

The same talking heads keep appearing in these headlines.  Like clockwork.

  1. › news › uk-56324215Meghan and Harry interview: Tabloid racism ‘large part’ of … Mar 8, 2021 · The Duke of Sussex has said racism from the tabloid press that filtered into the rest of society was a “large part” of why he and his wife left the UK.


  1. › news › uk-56324215Meghan and Harry interview: Tabloid racism ‘large part’
  1. Mar 8, 2021 · The Duke of Sussex has said racism from the tabloid press that filtered into the rest of society was a “large part” of why he and his wife left the UK.
  1. Meghan Markle ‘doesn’t feel safe’ as she ‘ditches’ UK return …
  1. Apr 9, 2024 · Meghan Markle ‘doesn’t feel safe’ as she ‘ditches’ UK return with Prince Harry and kids. Tasha Hall & Joseph Wilkes & Mitya Underwood. 9 April 2024 · 4-min read.
  1. › news › royalPrince Harry and Meghan Markle ‘not welcome in UK’
  1. Feb 12, 2024 · A royal biographer has hit out at Prince Harry and Meghan Markle in an interview – calling the pair “poisonous” and warning they are “not welcome in Britain”.. Speaking on GB News on Sunday,
  1. › uk-news › 2023Harry and Meghan face wildly different public perceptions
  1. May 17, 2023 · In the US, the Sussexes are just another celebrity couple – but intense UK tabloid interest means wherever they go, paparazzi will follow Wed 17 May 2023 15.45 EDT Last modified on Wed 17 May …
  1. › news › cbs-report-accuses-ukRacist Meghan headlines? CBS doubles down on criticism of UK ...
  1. Mar 18, 2021 · A CBS report has accused the UK press of having a “blatant” racial element in its Meghan coverage as it declined to amend a montage of “racist” headlines used in its Oprah interview.
  1. › magazines › closer-ukRoyal insider: ‘meghan is feeling bruised
  1. Jan 2, 2024 · TELL-ALL . But now royal author Tom Bower says that Meghan has been “bruised” by the backlash – which is likely to force her into penning her own tell-all memoir. He says, “As she feels more and more bruised as the year goes on, Meghan is going to want to have her say.
  1. › debate › article-9910267JAN MOIR: How ‘private’ pair Harry and Meghan still make …
    1. Aug 20, 2021 · JAN MOIR: How ‘private’ pair Harry and Meghan still make public so much pain is a mystery. But God help the Queen. By Jan Moir for the Daily Mail. Published: 19:22 EDT, 19 August 2021 |…
  1. › debate › article-11146893JAN MOIR: Unlike Meghan Markle, our unambitious Queen never …
  2. › debate › article-12980009JAN MOIR: Harry and Meghan are like two limpets
  1. Jan 18, 2024 · JAN MOIR: Harry and Meghan are like two eager limpets sucking nutrients off the rusty hull of the Royal Yacht Britannia | Daily Mail Online. By Jan Moir for the Daily Mail.


  1. › en-gb › newsJAN MOIR: Harry and Meghan given a lesson in what it … – MSN


  1. Oct 12, 2023 · JAN MOIR: Harry and Meghan given a lesson in what it means to be royal. Jan Moir for the Daily Mail. Posted: 12 October 2023 | Last updated: 13 October 2023.


  1. › lifestyle › jan-moir-harry-andJan Moir: Harry and Meghan need to earn our respect.
    1. Oct 21, 2019 · Jan Moir: Harry and Meghan need to earn our respect, not demand it. 20 Oct, 2019 05:11 PM 6 minutes to read. Harry and Meghan are tone-deaf to the concerns of real people, says Moir.


  1. Does Tom Bower want to damage Meghan Markle and Prince Harry?
    1. The respected biographer, Tom Bower, has been giving some extraordinary interviews about his new study of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry. His book, the calmly entitled Revenge, is not merely, we learn, a comprehensively negative assessment of the couple: Bower would like it actively to damage them.
  2. Meghan a threat to the royals? That’s one way to sell a book of tawdry
  3. NB These are just a few examples.  More information is held and is circulated from time to time, as part of the SGUK campaign relating to Human Rights legislation. All happily situated in the archives of each tabloid.  They are very proud of these and similar headlines and subsequent articles. 


Hate for Hire Business Model

A Labour MP has accused the British press of monetising online hatred of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

Rhondda MP Chris Bryant said newspapers had “filled their online sites” with “hateful Meghan Markle material”.

“It is becoming their richest clickbait scene… it drives viewing and earns advertising income,” he said.

He made the comments in a speech introduced by Hugh Grant at the annual

Mr Bryant said the monetary incentive was “why so many British opinion writers penned so much drivel about the couple”.

“Not because the story matters. It doesn’t. Not because the writers genuinely cares about it. They don’t. But because it makes money,” he said.

“That is not journalism. It’s a perversion of journalism and it means, yet again, the press see people lives as commodities to be traded.”


Image caption:-

Rhondda MP Christ Bryant made the comments in speech introduced by actor Hugh Grant, board member of press-reform group Hacked Off

Mr Bryant said one of the main reasons for the prevalence of hatred in media coverage were social media algorithms, and the type of content they promote.

He said the algorithms “nudge people to political extremes, they promote division, and they pervert the truth by creating an incentive for untruth”.

“Far from caring about the harmful impact of algorithms, social media companies and their allies/competitors in the press rely on them, I think, to make money,” he added.

‘Coordinated, deliberate hate’

Mr Bryant said analysis by data firm Bot Sentinel showed just 83 Twitter accounts were responsible for 70% of the negative content targeted at the royal couple.

“To the innocent bystander it looks like the whole world hated Harry and Meghan, but this is not just normal, spontaneous or altruistic hatred.

“It is coordinated and deliberate, it uses social media recommender systems to amplify hated.

“Like clickbait, it uses hatred to entice people to follow a link to an article on another client web page where money is to be made. Which is how it knowingly monetises hatred.”


  1. Sara Vine headlines re meghan

2. › femail › article-13423365Meghan Markle ‘didn’t like Britain’, Sarah Vine tells The …

  1. 1 day ago · Meghan Markle ‘didn’t like Britain’ and shouldn’t ‘gaslight the nation’ into ‘thinking we’ve behaved appallingly towards her’, Daily Mail columnist Sarah Vine has told this week’s The Reaction.
  2. SARAH VINE: Meghan’s startling new look reveals who she …
    1. Meghan’s startling new look reveals who she really was all…

4. › video › the-reaction‘He really is the SPARE!’ Sarah Vine reacts to Meghan Markle …

  1. On The Reaction this week, how successful was Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s tour of Nigeria, and what was the point? Sarah Vine says she feels a bit sorry for the Duke of Sussex, and that the tour was dominated by his wife. Andrew Pierce says the couple didn’t look as cheerful when they landed back in California. NB  After 3 full and packed days and a 17 hour flight back home, why is Andrew Pierce expecting big grins and cartwheels upon landing.  Just any excuse to print a negative headline.


The UK is broken by establishment, monarchy and its media pals.  The country is and will continue to pay a heavy price for the actions of a minority.  It just so happens to be an affluent minority – some of whom fund Hate for Hire initiatives.  The UK has been damaged and broken by a select number of people, and they should be made to pay for the damage that will take decades to even begin to cover half of lost ground and value. Chances they will continue to print detritus until their papers impact on their lifestyle outside of the UK.

  1. 1:07

A sneak peek of Forces For Change featuring women Meghan admires

29 Jul 2019


5. › debate › article-9582697SARAH VINE: It’s not all Meghan’s fault – we’re seeing the …

  1. May 15, 2021 · By Sarah Vine For The Mail On Sunday. Published: 17:00 EDT, 15 May 2021 | Updated: 03:58 EDT, 16 May 2021. 3.3k. When all this Prince Harry madness first began, there was little doubt in some…
  2. Author: Sarah Vine

6. › uk › daily-mailLet’s face it, this confirms what we always knew about her…

  1. Mar 16, 2024 · She’ll finally be relevant in her own right — and that is really all she’s ever wanted. Let’s face it, this was always where meghan was going to end up. She was never cut out for royal life: too selfless, too restrictiv­e, too unrewardin­g for a hothouse flower like her. This way she finally gets to be the star of her own show.

Author: Sarah Vine

7. › meghan-markle-doesnt-feel-safeMeghan Markle ‘doesn’t feel safe’ as she ‘ditches’ UK return …

  1. Apr 9, 2024 · A source has revealed that Meghan Markle’s reluctance to return to the UK isn’t just about security fears, but also stems from a worry of being plunged back into an anxiety-inducing environment…

8. › debate › article-11162103SARAH VINE: Meghan’s latest interview is an Exocet missile …

  1. Aug 30, 2022 · Meghan’s latest interview is an Exocet missile tipped with poison and aimed at the heart of the British monarchy. By Sarah Vine for the Daily Mail. Published: 17:00 EDT, 30 August 2022 |…


9. › video › the-reaction‘He really is the SPARE!’ Sarah Vine reacts to Meghan Markle …

  1. On The Reaction this week, how successful was Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s tour of Nigeria, and what was the point? Sarah Vine says she feels a bit sorry for the Duke of Sussex, and that the tour was dominated by his wife.


  1.› Sarah-Vine-Daily-MailSarah Vine for the Daily Mail | Daily Mail Online
  2. Apr 27, 2024 · January 2024. SARAH VINE: Harry and Meghan are casting themselves as refugees from a repressive regime.
    1. 0:19

2022: Meghan promises to be ‘unfiltered’ in new Spotify podcast

23 Aug 2022

  1. 0:57

Harry: Meghan and I were ‘better at job’ than Charles, Kate and Wills

15 Dec 2022


10. › royals › 12985852Meghan & Harry are desperately trying to be RIVAL royal …

  1. 1 day ago · PRINCE Harry and Meghan Markle are desperately trying to be rivals to the royal family to save their image, a royal expert has claimed. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have just returned to the US a…

11. › article › 281629605184124SARAH VINE – Daily Mail (2024-02-14)

  1. Feb 14, 2024 · His ‘people’, naturally, have hit back. A source close to the couple says: ‘ Prince Harry and Meghan are the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. That is a fact. It is their surname and family name.’ Which is, like so much that emerges from their camp, palpable nonsense. Sussex is emphatically not their family surname.

12. › news › royalsSARAH VINE: Let’s face it, Meghan’s lifestyle brand confirms …

  1. Mar 15, 2024 · SARAH VINE: Let’s face it, Meghan’s lifestyle brand confirms what we all always knew about her… By Sarah Vine for the Daily Mail. Published: 06:27 EDT, 15 March 2024 | Updated: 12:05 EDT, 19 …
  2. Author: Sarah Vine

13. › uk › daily-mailLet’s face it, this confirms what we always knew about her…

  1. Mar 16, 2024 · 2024-03-16 – By Sarah Vine AMERICAN riviera Orchard. is this the what3words address — the newfangled app that uses three words to identify almost every inch of the planet — for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s magnificen­t montecito mansion?

14. › columnists › article-12013235SARAH VINE: Meghan’s startling new look reveals who she …

  1. Apr 25, 2023 · Meghan’s startling new look reveals who she really was all along: A highly ambitious woman who knows what she wants and is determined to get it, writes SARAH VINE. By Sarah Vine for the…


British Royal Family is Not Well

No wonder their minds work overtime worrying about what the two non working Royals are doing or are going to do next, and how it is deliberately timed to cause the UK Monarchy  problems.  The sheer arrogance  to think that H&M are concerned about what any member of the BRF think of their activities.  Harry and Meghan were told numerous times to leave the UK, and the 8 year Hate for Hire campaign against them is now evident for the international community to see for themselves.  Every week that goes by, the proof is provided by the Monarchy or their pals that  Harry and Meghan’s conclusions about their treatment by the BRF is true.  Proof provided by the Monarch, or the Next in Line, or people working on their behalf.  Clear as day.


The Implication of the State of Health of the Current Monarch and the Next in Line

The Regency Act 1937 also established in law a procedure for determining the incapacity of the sovereign due to infirmity of mind or body. When a declaration of incapacity is under the Regency Act, a regency is established and the royal functions are transferred from the sovereign to the next in line of succession, namely Prince William the Prince of Wales.


Clear Signs of Mental Health Issues Existing and Decisions Being Made Re Actions Against the The Non Tax Payer Funded Couple Rather Than the Issues of the United Kingdom Which Should be the Priority

  • It appears that approximately 87% of time and resources is spent on ways to punish and control Prince Harry and force him back to the UK.
  • 10% is focussed on performative pomp and ceremony and paintings and footage of historical moments for future generations to admire/read about. Cost is not a factor.  Creating a version of history is the guiding force.
  • 3% of time appears to be devoted to Matters of State. This state of affairs cannot continue for much longer.

NB  Those percentages are mine.  Approximate statistics based on the activity reported in the printed and televised press and in news bulletins every day.  If this is anywhere near the percentage of time spent on categories of activity, this then means that the UK is on life support.


The British Royal Family do NOT HAVE CONTROL of Prince Harry and Princess Meghan since April 2020.  This 8 year hate campaign is being documented too, and future generations will have the opportunity to find out what took place here in the UK particularly since the 1990s when Princess Diana was also chosen as the establishment chew toy and who was vilified daily, and followed her every move.

Inside palace walls, the place seems to run like a Plantation, and people having to be on the right side of the senior Royals, if they wished to remain involved with Crown business.  It is run like a Slave Plantation, and the very idea that in 2024, there is still talk of forcing Prince Harry to do this and that.  Farcical and deluded.  It is a Cult, but one that UK taxpayers fund.  Children born into Cults have no scope for independent thought, and aspirations.  Child Protection Services would be knocking on the doors of working class people for minimal practices in such an institution, but because it is the Royal family, everyone turns a blind eye.  That is down to 100% indoctrination.  As things stand, less than a third of the population of the UK are Royalists, and most of those are the age group of most of the current combination of Working Royals.  Nature will no doubt take care of that support base over the coming years. Legal process needs to take care of giving the population regular opportunities to vote on their preference for a figurehead family or a Head of State position which can be voted on as to who fills that position on a regular basis.

All the clutching of pearls about Visa’s and Prince Harry, will never force him to return to the UK to be a footstool for unstable and undeserving people. The days of Spares and the inherent abuse, will end in the future. Should that day ever come, that all the Sussex family are forced to leave the USA because of the shenanigans of the Heritage Foundation and similar links within the UK ,including the UK Royal family itself.  There is a level of delusion that is beyond embarrassing.  Modern day slavery is not sanctioned and I am certain the UK is the last place the Sussex family would choose to reside. Taking their home away from them was a low blow, even for the Monarchy, but history books will be explicit about what really went on and why.  Prince Harry is no ones footstool.  The amount of time and resources spent on trying to break this couple and force them back to be the footstool of the BRF and its RRs is shameful and will result in yet another example to add to the growing list of petty and narcissistic behaviour which will fail. The boy and man the Monarchy had control over, is seen the options the world has to offer, and he has decided to set about earning his own income and building a new life outside of the confines of a system that he had no say on being born into.  As per usual when a man marries and moves away, the family blame the partner, and describe the person as controlling.;  Not an ounce of self reflection and no acknowledgement of basic Human Rights, including choices as to how and where one decides to live and work.  No one should be deliberately brought into the world, purely to be a footstool for older siblings and the wider Royal family.  Slavery in an opulent setting is still slavery.  An 8 year campaign of activity breaching several Articles within the Human Rights Act, and coercive control acts applied to force the Prince back to the abuse that he is used to, but to leave his wife and children behind.  That is not a reality for any sane person to even consider.  I want to see legal action taken on many fronts.  Forcing people to accept abuse for the protection of an abusive institution needs to become public and research papers produced over the coming decades.  People should be in roles due to competence not birthright, and they have the freedom to leave when they choose.  The Sussexes leaving was due to Constructive Dismissal in effect, and compensation is well overdue, plus the added £2.4m spent on Frogmore Cottage, when there was already an allowance set aside for all Crown property renovations, including Frogmore Cottage.  The Sussexes are owed money, including the £2.4m.  It probably wont be paid, but i want to see it documented in international legal papers, as being something that should have been considered, but due to the coercive control tactics placed upon this couple since 2020, the Sussexes were not forced back into abuse due to lack of funds, even after paying out unnecessarily due to Royal demands.  As for Constructive Dismissal, that cost could also be very high indeed.  The Sussexes are kinder than most people would be under the circumstances.

Let us not forget that Meghan was not regarded as “family” and no funds were set aside like all the other people who married into the Royal Family.  Meghan used her own money to go on all the Royal tours and visits that the Royal Family sent her on, and paid for all of her own expenses, including costumes made by local designers of the places visited. One of those successful tours was to an area which was declared dangerous by the foreign office.  Harry and Meghan went anyway, and lets not forget that Meghan was heavily pregnant at that time.  No other Royal pregnant person would have been sent on a tour with an official notice issued about the dangers, but Meghan did it all, including travelling by helicopter in mountainous zones.  It was a huge success, but according to you she was not family.

When suffering with suicidal ideation, and requested help, Royal Human Rsources declared that Meghan was not an employee either, and therefore they could not contact anyone regarding medical assistance.  Royal HR also admitted that it would look bad on the Royal Family if it was reported that one of their own was suffering in this way, due to conditions placed upon her since marrying into the family.

If Meghan was not family and not an employee, that leaves only one description that is apt.  Meghan was the BRF Slave.  The compensation for such treatment, together with Royal HR breach in Data Protection by holding face to face discussions with one Royal Reporter in particular, about the state of Meghan’s Mental Health.  The Sussex family is owed so much and i want to see it documented in a legal setting.  The family are more than financially bouyant, but the Royal Family deliberately left them with meagre funding and asked them to do more than anyone in the family, and then had the nerve to be unhappy with how well they did everything thrown at them.  Fragile egos are not good leadership traits.

One would think that a priority for the current King would be to look at the constituent parts of the Senior Working Royal group.  Introduce Workforce Planning alongside Succession Planning.  Look at the things you have listed on the website as being areas of work you are all responsible for, and actually document essential work, rather than things you would like to do.  To be effective, each individual cannot possibly manage a number of projects amounting to a four future total each year. It may look good on paper, but it is fictional and is impossible to do well and add value to the organisations and causes concerned.  Once you have sifted out the tumbleweed elements, and have a list of work projects which are deemed essential, that list should be scrutinised by others outside of the British Royal family.  Ie people who are in business and know what is required, rather than approve a family wish list.

Look at the ‘workforce’ you have, and realistically assess how that handful of people can possibly cover the duties involved with each of those causes. Either additional resources are brought into the frame, or the list of essentials has to be discussed and a total removed from the essential list, with explanations why they are no longer essential for the Monarchy to be involved in the foreseeable future. Every activity on the public records need to demonstrate VFM and how it is measured etc.

One final point that I think is worth mentioning is the issue of the Monarch’s priority being climate change.  I give no opinion here on whether that topic is a relevant one or not, but I do respectfully suggest that the Monarch does not choose a topic recommending what organisations should be aiming for, when the Monarchy itself asked to be exempt from any of the legal requirements and measures and standards asked of every other entity within the UK.  In doing so, you are weakening the whole approach, when the Royal family are allowed to opt out of the measures that everyone else has to demonstrate that they are working towards.  The same applies to Equality legislation.  No employer should be afraid to adhere to equality within the workplace.  Everyone is equal under the law is the official line, but it seems everyone but those who are employees of the figurehead family is entitled to be protected under the law.  None of these things make sense to me, at all, and is yet another reason to question the usefulness of the current set up.

Please remember that even if the majority of the UK hate Harry and Meghan, it is based upon a Hate for Hire model, and ties in with the Brexit vote in 2016.  The country is now circling the drain.  The UK is now known for being racist and extreme right wing – no matter what fictional Reports were published recently; that were written with political bias.  The state of the UK over the last 14 years because of those right wing views, and the number of discussions held in the media using rhetoric that would not have been acceptable not too long ago, shows how far down the slippery slope the UK has fallen.  All the contrived polls mean nothing to anyone outside of the UK, possibly with the exception of a few countries amounting to a single figure.  Even the Royal mouthpieces have openly said that there is no love for Black Commonwealth countries.  We knew that already. Carry on.  You are dismantling a once thriving nation, which is now circling the drain of life.  The UK is but a dot on the landscape, and the world has seen the underbelly now of what UK officials think of anyone who is not white.  The Commonwealth exists because the UK is trying to cling to days of Empire.  Let it go.

The treatment of Meghan since 2016, and the concerted campaign of nasty and evil content, proved the real nature of the Rota, and it is a malignant self serving entity.  People of colour from around the world, view the UK Royal Family in a different light now, and it will never return to how it used to be.  You both (ie establishment and Monarchy) exist because the establishment needs you there. In fact you need each other.  The country does not.  The delusion is real to Royalists but the rest of us can see the truth. The UK deserves better and as I mentioned earlier, nature will take care of that situation over the next few years.


Ivy Barrow

19th May 2024



NB Lots of direct links to articles also contained within the main body of the article.